![]() ![]() Some programs won't even open the HE* file. basic RGB histogram + for each channel, screen sharpening and focus peaking. Thanks for correcting me, you are right!!īut it does shows : HE*. Unfortunately, it cannot show RAW data or information about it for these files. I'm using 2.0.5, and it's only capable of showing information about embedded JPEG preview in HE and HE* RAW files. But, that investigation and skill development depends on some actual example images and / or your actual settings from the editors.īeen using the Nikon processing all along (years, and always shift to the new when released) and it does what I need.the latest is pretty darn good, I'm a fan.I use it. ![]() Does DXO allow for a DNG export, something that might enable transfer of your processing settings?įor the two LR links above, have you reviewed those examples and compared the examples with the possible similar settings / tools in DXO?Įlliott - now that you've seen the possibilities of other software, we should be able to point to where your current workflow is skipping steps and / or using inappropriate defaults. If no, can you screen capture your DXO settings for Noise and Sharpening. Have you investigated alternative profiles or moving the sliders around yourself? Have you investigated any of the Topaz training / demo videos on Utube?Ĭan you post and store a specific example for comparison and analysis? Will your NEF fit under the 20MB size limit for an attachment. Topaz AI has a number of profiles as well as letting you customize the level of noise processing. When you sharpen, what you doing? Which software? Which settings? When you process Noise, what are you doing? Which software? Which settings? I will no longer use either DxO Pure Raw or Topaz DeNoise.I tried the Nikon software (the latest is NX Studi. Give it a try and you'll change how you process as I have. I will no longer use either DxO Pure Raw or Topaz DeNoise. NX Studio can batch convert, and send any converted TIF file directly to your post-processing program of choice - it's easy to figure out how - so no need to save the TIF file. I then used this same procedure to many other photos and got similarly improved results. Then I did the same processing as I had done in AF and the results are so much better. WOW - no loss of detail and minimal noise which is easily adjusted in AP. Then I had an epiphany - I downloaded the latest version of Nikon's NX Studio (free) and converted one of the raw files into the Nikon TIF format (no adjustments made, just conversion) and took the TIF into Affinity Photo. I tried different settings in Topaz and in DxO with no improvement. The only process that removed detail was de-noising. I spent hours trying to figure out what I did wrong and in the process found other images that lacked detail. One of our UHH members sent me a PM indicating that some of my images lacked detail - he was correct. My latest processing was to first convert raw files in either DxO Pure Raw or Topaz DeNoise AI and then process in AP. I've been converting raw files (and processing) in Affinity Photo (AP) and prior to using AP I did the same in Photoshop. I tried the Nikon software (the latest is NX Studio) several times and never liked it, mostly since there are no layers and masking is almost non-existent. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |